![]() ![]() Stallman did agree that the graphical design could improve usability, "but I have a feeling that the changes that would help are deeper issues than the shape of corners". Until it gets that rewrite, changes in it are likely to break something. The code to interface Emacs to X-based GUIs needs rewriting by an expert, and has needed it for decades. Stallman said that there are some technical barriers in finding someone interested in and capable of doing the work needed, but there is an overarching problem that needs to be addressed first: ![]() He wondered if there was "any reason not to improve the default look". ![]() I also don't know that it's helpful to assume that the rest of the world will take the enlightened stance. Graphical design elements can also improve usability. I think it's unfortunate if we assume that this is all bells and whistles. Richard Stallman, one of the original authors of Emacs, seemed somewhat dismissive in his reply: "Perhaps we should implement a mode that puts cosmetics on Emacs so it will appeal to those who judge by the surface of things." But Stefan Kangas thought there was more to it than that: The discussion started with a post from "ndame" asking why Emacs is "so square" the appearance of things like buttons could be improved with rounded corners, they said. #CHANGE AQUAMACS THEME HOW TO#Then it reports on a "mega-thread" on the emacs-devel mailing list about how to make Emacs more appealing and attractive to users: Emacs "predates Linux, and was once far more popular," writes LWN.net, while adding that the text editor "has fallen into relative obscurity over the years." ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |